At Kestrel IQ, we believe clarity is measurable. It is seen in time saved, money protected, and trust built. To appreciate the value of clarity, you first have to recognise what it costs when it is missing.
Why We Need to Understand the Hidden Costs
Every decision rests on beliefs about what is true. Some of those beliefs are well founded. Others are assumptions disguised as facts. The danger lies in leaving those assumptions untested. What seems efficient at first becomes expensive later, because correcting a wrong course after weeks or months is far more difficult than pausing to test it at the start.
>The Silent Drain on Time and Resources
>The Silent Drain on Time and Resources
>The Ripple Effect on Decision Making
Assumptions rarely stay contained. A single untested belief influences a chain of decisions, each building on the last. By the time the error is obvious, the organisation has already invested heavily in the wrong direction. Reversing course becomes costly, not only financially but also in momentum and credibility. Clarity prevents this ripple effect. It acts as an anchor, keeping decisions aligned across planning, execution, and delivery. With clarity, choices reinforce each other. Without it, even the most well-intentioned strategies risk drifting off course.
>The Cultural Cost: Trust and Alignment
Recent Industry Insight
Even widely cited models can falter when their assumptions are hidden or outdated. A recent Guardian article illustrates this, reporting on Fortescue's public rejection of the Business Council of Australia’s projections for achieving a 70 percent emissions reduction by 2035. The projections, based on McKinsey-led modelling, were criticised for relying on cost assumptions that had not been disclosed to council members. Critics also argued that the model drew on outdated data and overlooked the economic opportunities of decarbonisation (The Guardian).
This example highlights how even high-profile forecasts can rest on fragile foundations. When assumptions are not transparent and regularly tested, they risk distorting both risks and opportunities. It reinforces the need to treat clarity as a deliberate practice that safeguards performance and long-term resilience.
Reference: The Guardian – "Andrew Forrest’s Fortescue rejects ‘credibility’ of business council modelling on 2035 emissions target", Dan Jervis-Bardy & Adam Morton, 5 September 2025.
The Impact of Clarity at Kestrel IQ
> What assumptions are shaping this decision
> What evidence supports them
> What risks do we face if they prove false
>Practical Experience behind Our Approach
Although Kestrel IQ is a new consultancy, our perspective is shaped by years of experience in data and analytics roles where assumptions went untested and the costs became clear. We have seen projects where reports were built on unreliable data, leading to confident decisions that later proved flawed. We have also seen teams prioritise output over understanding, only to realise that what they delivered did not match what stakeholders truly expected or what customers really wanted. These experiences inform our conviction that clarity is not an abstract concept. It is essential to building confidence in data, in decisions, and in the direction of the organisation.Support Where You Are
3 Ways to Reduce the Cost of Missing Clarity
#1 - Name Assumptions Early and Often
#2 - Test Assumptions Before Scaling
#3 - Review and Recalibrate Regularly
An assumption that was safe last year may not hold today. Markets shift, competitors adapt, and customer expectations evolve. Clarity is not a one-time achievement; it is an ongoing discipline. Treat it like routine maintenance for your decision-making engine. Just as you would not drive a car for years without a service check, you should not drive strategy forward without revisiting the assumptions under the hood.
A Practical First Step
Because one moment of clarity can change everything.
